Is erik rhodes dating anyone
Please share your opinion at Talk: Erik Rhodes (actor).
—Doc , 2 July 2006 (UTC) On the contrary, the usual example here is to add a disambiguation page only for three or more of a name.
Although he could appeal to anyone, I think more people would use Wikipedia to try to find info on their favorite porn star.
--Todd , 3 July 2006 (UTC) I hardly think that anyone would use Wikipedia to try and find pornography.
However for the present, I have followed the solution that I have seen used before where there are many links for the most known name which is to redirect to that name and with pointers to the disambiguation page at the top of both pages.
The only reasons for making the move would be because the actor's article was up first, or because you think the actor is more notable.--Doc , 3 July 2006 (UTC) 70 years ago, I would have definitely agreed with you, the actor would be very notable, and would deserve the main page.Currently, both actors appeal to niche markets, which is why I think the default page should be the disambiguation page.I am an inclusionist, so I'm not saying that the article should not be here, but to stack it next to an established actor who performed with Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire on stage and in the movies and who's family appeal is to all markets does not compare in my opinion.A porn star's appeal is to a niche market unless he/she becomes known for something more than that.